Journal of Mid-life Health Journal of Mid-life Health
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise Users Online: 998  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 




 
 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 123-129  

Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in climacteric women: A cross-sectional study


Post Graduation Program in Health Sciences at Medical Sciences Faculty, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Date of Web Publication21-Sep-2018

Correspondence Address:
Isabel Cristina Gomes Moura
275, Alfredo Balena Ave, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_67_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Purpose: To identify cardiovascular risk factors in women between 40 and 65 years old in two private clinic of gynecology in Minas Gerais. Methods: Cross-sectional study from January/2016 to January/2017 in 137 climacteric women. A standardized questionnaire was used to evaluate socio-demographic characteristics, climacteric phases, cardiovascular risk factors, menopause (age, time and type), number of pregnancies, normal births, abortions, partners and hormonal therapy. The evaluation model was used according to the Framingham risk score. Results: The median age was 47 years, and 35% were postmenopausal. The majority were married and 42.3% caucasian. Abdominal circumference greater than 80 cm was observed in 87.6%, and greater than 88 cm in 67.2%. High total cholesterol (TC) was observed in 48.2%. Low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL-c) were observed in 42.3%. Elevated levels were observed for low density lipoprotein (LDL-c) in 39.4%, triglycerides in 29.9%, and fasting glucose in 8.8%. Also, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were considered high in 25.5% cases. Postmenopausal women presented higher values of TC and HDL-c. Analysis of the Framingham risk score revealed a higher cardiovascular risk for postmenopausal women. Higher values of waist circumference, glycemia and triglycerides were observed for women with higher cardiovascular risk. Conclusions: Postmenopausal women had a higher risk of cardiovascular events when compared to premenopausal ones.

Keywords: Climacteric, coronary artery disease, hyperlipidemia, risk factors


How to cite this article:
Santos Mota MP, Gomes Moura IC, Marinho RM, Sternick EB, Almeida AM. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in climacteric women: A cross-sectional study. J Mid-life Health 2018;9:123-9

How to cite this URL:
Santos Mota MP, Gomes Moura IC, Marinho RM, Sternick EB, Almeida AM. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in climacteric women: A cross-sectional study. J Mid-life Health [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Oct 21];9:123-9. Available from: http://www.jmidlifehealth.org/text.asp?2018/9/3/123/241945




   Introduction Top


The climacteric and menopause are defined as a biological phase which comprises the transition between reproductive and nonreproductive periods. Menopause is the last menstrual cycle, recognized after 12 months of its occurrence.[1]

The association between the loss of ovarian function and the increase of coronary risk is well established. Women develop cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) approximately 10 years later than men.[1] In the age range of 45–64 years, 10% of women have some form of CVD, while after 65 years, this proportion is 25%.[2]

The risk factors for CVD may be nonmodifiable (age, sex, and family history) and modifiable (sedentary lifestyle, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus [DM], total cholesterol [TC], lipoprotein [Lp]) of high- and low-intensity [high-density Lp-cholesterol (HDL-c)/low-density Lp-cholesterol (LDL-c)]), triglycerides (TG), (Lp [a]), and metabolic disorders (obesity, especially abdominal, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome [MS]).[3]

To estimate cardiovascular risk, the ideal would be to determine the total risk, which must be the parameter for the clinical and therapeutic-preventive decision.[4] Prediction scores were clinically developed to identify overall cardiovascular risk, as the Framingham risk score (FRS). The pharmacological and nonpharmacological conducts can be based on the risk factors present in the score.[5]

The objective of this study is to compare the cardiovascular risk, per menopause phase (pre- or post-menopausal) in women from 40 to 65 years, in private practice of gynecology in Minas Gerais State, Brazil.


   Methods Top


A cross-sectional study was carried out in menopausal women, 40–65 years, from January 16th to January 17th in two private practices in Minas Gerais state, Brazil.

For the menopause phases, it was considered the menstrual pattern in the last year and the value of follicle-stimulation hormone (FSH) in women without uterus, being in premenopausal with menstrual cycles in the last year, and postmenopausal, when confirmed spontaneous amenorrhea for 12 months or more. In hysterectomized patients, it was considered the ones in menopause with FSH above 40 IU/ml.[6]

The sample size was calculated using a study as reference.[7] At 5% level of significance, minimum power of 80%, adopting as reference value of the prevalence of 56%, and a maximum error of 10%, 137 women were necessary.

The participants were invited to respond to a standardized questionnaire to assess the sociodemographic characteristics; menopause stages, cardiovascular risk factors: Blood pressure (BP), DM, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), smoking, alcohol, physical activity, diet, family history and history of CVD, and use of hormone therapy (HT). They were also requested laboratorial examinations (computed tomography [CT], HDL-c, LDL-c, TG, and glycemia).

For the BMI calculation, it was used the weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2). The BMI cut-off points adopted were normal (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2), and obesity ≥30.0 kg/m2.[8] WC was measured in centimeters with flexible and stretchable tape measure without compressing the tissues. It was measured on an imaginary horizontal line that passed the mid-point between the lower edge of the last rib and the iliac crest.[9] The cut-off points adopted were those recommended in accordance with the degree of risk for CVD in women: increased risk (WC >80 cm) and very increased risk (WC >88 cm).[10]

The following were defined as risk factors for CVD: values of TG ≥150 mg/dl, glycemia ≥110 mg/dl, levels of TC ≥200 mg/dl, LDL-c ≥130 mg/dl and HDL-c <50 mg/dl, and systolic BP (SBP) ≥130 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) ≥85 mmHg.[11] The presence of MS was defined according to the criteria of NCEP-ATPIII,[12] which requires the presence of three or more than five factors (a) CA: >88 cm; (b) TG ≥150 mg/dl; (c) HDL-c <50 mg/dl; (d) SBP ≥130 mmHg or DBP ≥85 mmHg; and (e) fasting glucose ≥110 mg/dl.

To assess the cardiovascular risk, the model of cardiovascular risk assessment of Framingham was used, called the FRS, which is used to estimate the absolute risk for the development of ischemic coronary disease or death as a result in 10 years, which includes in its calculation, data regarding age, gender, serum values of TC and HDL-c, BP, and smoking. It is defined as a high cardiovascular risk scores >20%, intermediate cardiovascular risk (10–20%), and low (<10%).[13]

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences – MG with CAEE no. 48757015.6.0000.5134 and opinion no. 1.281.400.

This article was prepared on the basis of recommendations strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology[14] for cross-sectional observational studies.

Statistical analysis

The categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages, and the numeric variables were as mean ± standard deviation (normality was assessed through Shapiro–Wilk test) or median ± interquartile range (IQR, in case of nonnormal distribution). For comparison of numerical variables among groups, the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney U-test and t-test for independent samples were used. The association among categorical variables was evaluated through Fisher's exact test or Chi-square test of independence. Spearman's correlation was performed to verify the relationship between cardiovascular risk factors and WC. The analysis was performed using the software R version 3.3.2, supported by the R Core Team. Vienna, Austria. It was considered significance level of 5%.


   Results Top


The sample was composed of 137 women, postmenopausal (35%). The median age was 47 ± 10 years; 81.6% were married/lived with a partner and white race (42.3%). Of these, 35.8% had 12 or more years of study and personal income between one to two minimum wages (33%) [Table 1]. Postmenopausal women were older (P < 0.001) and there was a smaller proportion of married/with a partner women (P = 0.049) [Table 1].
Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of women from 40 to 65 years, in the pre- and post-menopausal, in private clinic of gynecology in Betim/MG and Igarape/MG

Click here to view


The average age at menopause was 48.6 ± 4.2 years, and the average time of menopause was 7.9 ± 5.4 years. The TH was used by only 10.2% (27.1% in postmenopausal women). The majority of women (89.1%) had some pregnancy, 63% had a normal delivery, and 31.2% had an abortion.

With respect to the cardiovascular risk factors, the values observed for the median BMI was 26 ± 6 kg/m2, WC average (93.8 ± 11.5 cm), SBP (120 ± 20 mmHg) and DBP median (75 ± 15 mmHg) and median values in mg/dl for TC (198 ± 50), HDL-c (52 ± 19), LDL-c (122 ± 51), TG (114 ± 73), and glycemia (86 ± 15). Only 8% of women were diabetic, smokers or former smokers (26.3%), alcohol consumption (27.7%), and practiced physical activity (35.8%). The majority 82.5% had a family history of CVD (father and/or mother in 73% of the sample), and the history of CVD was reported by 24.3%. Postmenopausal women showed higher values of TC and HDL-c (P = 0.005 in both cases) [Table 2].
Table 2: Cardiovascular risk factors in women from 40 to 65 years, in the pre- and post-menopausal, in private clinic of gynecology in Betim/MG and igarape/MG

Click here to view


Only 6.6% were current smokers, while 19.7% were former smokers. It was observed WC>80 cm in 87.6% and >88 cm in 67.2% of the women. The CT of at least 200 mg/dl was observed in 48.2%, being higher among those in postmenopausal (P = 0.022), and HDL-c <50 mg/dl was observed in 42.3%, being smaller between the postmenopausal (P = 0.005) and LDL-c to at least 130 mg/dl (39.4%). It was observed TG of at least 150 mg/dl in 29.9%, SBP ≥130 mmHg in 25.5%, DBP ≥85 mmHg in 25.5%, glycemia ≥110 mg/dl in 8.8% and MS in 35% of the women [Table 3].
Table 3: Cardiovascular risk factors in women from 40 to 65 years, in the pre- and post-menopausal, in private clinic of gynecology in Betim/MG and igarape/MG

Click here to view


On analyzing the FRS, 9.5% of women presented intermediate/high risk for CVD, this percentage is equal to 6.7% (premenopausal) and 14.6% (postmenopausal) women (P = 0.219). The median value of cardiovascular risk in 10 years was 3.9 ± 3.9, being greater in postmenopausal (P < 0.001) [Table 4].
Table 4: Risk scores of Framingham in women from 40 to 65 years, in the pre- and post-menopausal, in private clinic of gynecology in Betim/MG and igarape/MG

Click here to view


In the comparison of risk factors for CVD in the categories of the FRS, it was observed higher values for women with intermediate/high risk (P = 0.044), glycemia (0.033), and TG (P = 0.007). All women with intermediate risk/high presented MS (P < 0.001) [Table 5].
Table 5: Risk factors for cardiovascular disease (not included in the obtaining of the Framingham risk score) according to categories of risk of Framingham in women 40 to 65 years, in the pre- and post-menopausal, in medical private office of gynecology in Betim/MG

Click here to view


When the components of the MS were evaluated, abdominal circumference >88 cm was observed in 93.6% of women followed by HDL-c <50 mg/dl (66%), high levels of TG (61.7%), DBP increased (51%), SBP increased (55%) and glucose ≥110 mg/dl (23.4%).

When it was considered the association between WC and other risk factors for CVD, the association between MS and HDL-c was reverse (r = −0,273), an increase in WC leads to decreased HDL-c (P = 0.001). The WC was related positively with the high levels of TG (r = 0.207; P = 0.015), SBP (r = 0.239; P = 0.005), and glucose levels (r = 0.322; P < 0.001), indicating that the increase of these parameters was related to the increase in the WC.


   Discussion Top


Organic variables that define the cardiovascular risk (TC, HDL-c, LDL-c, TG, and glycemia) usually arise or worsen in the climacteric period, resulting in an increase in the occurrence of cardiovascular events in women.[15] Before the menopause, the values of TC and LDL-c levels are lower in women when compared to men in the same age range, and the HDL-c is higher among women. The postmenopause is a period of relative hyperandrogenism, as a consequence of the decline of estrogens, in comparison to the androgens, which can lead to the formation of atherosclerosis, with increased levels of LDL-c and TC, and decrease in the levels of HDL-c.[16]

In this study, the mean age was 49 years, 35% in postmenopausal. High levels of TC were observed in 48.2%, being higher among those in postmenopausal. Reduced HDL-c was observed in 42.3% of the women, being smaller among postmenopausal. The mean values of TG were higher in women after menopause as well as LDL-c; however, the differences were not statistically significant.

Comparing these results with studies performed in the Brazilian National Health System, a retrospective study conducted in 164 women, 69.5% in postmenopausal. The mean age was 61 years. It was also observed an increase of risk factors for CVD in postmenopausal and some with greater severity as the levels of TC (59.6%) and LDL-c (58.8%). The levels of HDL-c were considered below the ideal in 61.4% and TG levels were elevated in 48.2% of them.[17]

The same was observed in another retrospective study carried out in 100 women, aged 45–60 years, being 55% in postmenopausal. When the biochemical components were analyzed, it was observed the elevation of serum levels of TC (78%), with a greater percentage among those in postmenopausal, and rates of LDL-c increased in 81% of the participants, that was also higher among those in postmenopausal.[7]

In this study, women in postmenopausal showed greater cardiovascular risk. Considering the other risk factors that did not comprise the FRS, it was observed in women with intermediate risk/high, higher values of WC (P = 0.044), fasting glycemia (0.033), and TG (P = 0.007). It was also observed that all women with intermediate risk/high had MS. According to Wilson et al.,[13] it is estimated that half of all cardiovascular events in women is related to the MS. Some studies[7],[17] used the FRS to estimate the absolute risk for the development of ischemic coronary disease, or death as a result, in 10 years. Versiani et al.[17] showed that 17.5% of women in postmenopausal presented high cardiovascular risk and 48.2% intermediate risk. Piazza et al.[7] demonstrated a higher cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women.

Meta-analysis[18] held in 46,000 men and 11,000 women of 17 prospective studies showed that high levels of TG were associated with an increase in cardiovascular risk of 30% for men and 75% for women. A study carried out in Iran with 940 women aged between 20 and 76 years observed that 95.4% of women in postmenopausal presented values of TG increased.[19] Although in this study, the difference between the mean values of TG in pre- and post-menopausal were not verified, when evaluated the cardiovascular risk, it was observed that high levels of TG were related with intermediate/high risk of CVD based on the FRS. It was also observed that the increase in the WC correlated positively with high levels of TG.

In a systematic review,[20] the increase of glycemia in the menopausal transition was observed in all studies. The studies that showed major changes of fasting glycemia in the menopausal transition were the population-based study carried out in Iran:[19] premenopausal (25.5%) and postmenopausal (60.3%) and in Poland:[21] premenopausal (13%) and postmenopausal (55%). When considering the means of fasting plasma glucose levels, the lowest values were recorded in a cohort study conducted in the Netherlands:[22] premenopausal (75.6 mg/dL) and postmenopausal (84.6 mg/dL). Higher results were observed in a population-based study carried out in Iran:[23] premenopausal (103 mg/dL) and postmenopausal (114 mg/dL), and in India:[24] premenopausal (102 mg/dL) and postmenopausal (123 mg/dL). In this study, the percentage of women with high fasting glycemia was similar among premenopausal and postmenopausal period, but considering the cardiovascular risk, the glycemia presented higher values for women with intermediate risk/high, and it was observed that the increase of WC was related positively with fasting glycemia.

Overweight and especially abdominal obesity correlate with the majority of the cardiovascular risk factors, mainly with high levels of TG and reduced levels of HDL-c, showing a greater impact also on BP elevation.[25] In menopause, changes in body fat distribution may increase the risk of CVD and metabolic disorders. During the menopausal transition, the form of body fat distribution of women seems to modify, presenting a tendency to accumulate in the abdominal region. The transition to the menopause does not contribute directly to weight gain but for the redistribution of body fat, with more deposition in the abdominal region.[26]

In this study, 87.6% presented WC values >80 cm and WC >88 cm (67.2%). There was no difference in the proportion of WC >88 cm in the pre- and post-menopausal women. It was also observed that postmenopausal showed higher cardiovascular risk when compared to premenopausal, being verified higher values of abdominal circumference in women with intermediate risk/high. It was also observed a positive correlation between WC with TG, SBP, and fasting blood glucose levels, indicating that the increase of these parameters was associated to the increase of WC. Another study carried out in 165 menopausal women in Iran also observed a positive and significant correlation with SBP (r = 0.26; P = 0.02) and DPB (r = 0.16; P = 0.05).[27]

The menopausal transition is associated to a significant weight gain (2–2.5 kg on average), concomitantly, there is an increase in adiposity and a decrease in energy expenditure.[28] Weight gain and obesity drove the increase of MS in postmenopausal women.[29] Thus, such phenomena have been identified as essential to explain increased risk of SM and increased levels of TC and TG, and the menopause has been considered a predictor of SM, regardless of age in women.[19] In this study, women with MS showed higher WC and higher levels of SBP, DBP, TG, and fasting glycemia. The WC was increased by 93.6% of the women with MS. In addition, based on the FRS, all women with intermediate/high risk had SM. When considered the association between WC and risk factors for CVD, the increase in WC led to a decrease in HDL-c. The reduced HDL-c occurred in greater proportion in postmenopausal women; however, the levels of HDL-c in the sample were high, which contributes to the reduction of the risk of coronary disease. In a systematic review to assess the prevalence of MS and its components in the menopausal transition, the majority of studies presented in the menopausal transition increase at the measure of WC and levels of BP, TG, and glycemia, besides reducing the levels of HDL-c.[20] It was also found in another study that evaluated women in menopause, abdominal obesity in 76.6% of women in premenopausal women and 85.2% in postmenopausal women.[15] Cohort study with 1276 women carried out in the Netherlands found that in the premenopausal period the mean of WC was 78.4 cm (±11.3), while in postmenopausal women was 86.1 cm (±11.5).[22] On the other hand, in Asian women abdominal obesity was lower, that is, 16.4% premenopause and 29.1% postmenopause[30] and may be related to the lifestyle of Asian women.

Observational studies of climacteric women have as a limitation the difficulty of precise determination of the onset of menopause and occurrence of menopause (last menstrual period). The beginning of the climacteric ends up being confused with age, and the menopause can be influenced with the use of HT. The small number of patients who used HT did not allow the completion of analyzes considering the use or not of HT. Another limitation relates to the use of a convenience sample; however, the results corroborate with the findings reported in the literature with relation to increased cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women.

Cardiovascular risk factors are neglected in women, especially during the transition of menopause, when the susceptibility to cardiovascular events increases. In Brazil, the CVD is the major causes of mortality and postmenopausal women presented higher values of cardiovascular events when compared to premenopausal women. As a result, it is justified the investigation of factors of cardiovascular risk in women in the pre- and post-menopausal period, to clarify the main risk factors for CVD and reflect on the possible interventions of health professionals in the modifiable risk factors, considering lifestyle changes that lead to the alteration, in the long term, of cardiovascular phenomena of this population, to reduce the morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular events.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Brazil, Health Ministry. Health Brazil 2007: An analysis of the health situation. Brasilia, DF; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Fernandes CE, Pinho Neto JSL, Gebara OCE, Santos Filho RD, Pinto Neto AM, Pereira Filho AS, et al. Brazilian guideline on cardiovascular disease prevention in climacteric women and the influence of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) of the Brazilian Cardiology Society (SBC) and the Brazilian Association of Climateric (SOBRAC). Arq Bras Cardiol 2008;91(1 suppl.1):1-23.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Stangl V, Baumann G, Stangl K. Coronary atherogenic risk factors in women. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1738-52.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Achutti A. Prevention of cardiovascular diseases and the promotion of health. Cien Saude Colet 2012;17:18-20.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Rodondi N, Locatelli I, Aujesky D, Butler J, Vittinghoff E, Simonsick E, et al. Framingham risk score and alternatives for prediction of coronary heart disease in older adults. PLoS One 2012;7:e34287.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
De Lorenzi DRS, Danelon C, Saciloto B, Padilha Jr I. Predicting factors of climacteric symptoms. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2005;27:12-19.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Piazza IP, De Lorenzi DR, Saciloto B. Evaluation of the cardiovascular risk among climacteric women attended at a family health program. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2005;26:200-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva: Report of a World Health Organization Consultation on Obesity; 1995.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Heyward VH, Stolarczyk LM. Applied Body Composition Assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1996.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lean ME, Han TS, Morrison CE. Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. BMJ 1995;311:158-61.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Rezende FA, Rosado LE, Ribeiro Rde C, Vidigal Fde C, Vasques AC, Bonard IS, et al. Body mass index and waist circumference: Association with cardiovascular risk factors. Arq Bras Cardiol 2006;87:728-34.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult treatment panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486-97.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998;97:1837-47.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Malta M, Cardoso LO, Bastos FI, Magnanini MM, Silva CM. STROBE initiative: Guidelines on reporting observational studies. Rev Saude Publica 2010;44:559-65.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Figueiredo Neto JA, Figuerêdo ED, Barbosa JB, Barbosa Fde F, Costa GR, Nina VJ, et al. Metabolic syndrome and menopause: Cross-sectional study in gynecology clinic. Arq Bras Cardiol 2010;95:339-45.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Banks AD. Women and heart disease: Missed opportunities. J Midwifery Womens Health 2008;53:430-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Versiani CM, Freire AC, Dias GMM, Brito BD, Rocha JSB, Reis VMCP. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in climacteric women aided by Family Health Program. Rev Soc Bras Clin Med 2013;11:339-43.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hokanson JE, Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: A meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk 1996;3:213-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Eshtiaghi R, Esteghamati A, Nakhjavani M. Menopause is an independent predictor of metabolic syndrome in Iranian women. Maturitas 2010;65:262-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Mendes KG, Theodoro H, Rodrigues AD, Olinto MT. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components in the menopausal transition: A systematic review. Cad Saude Publica 2012;28:1423-37.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Siemińska L, Wojciechowska C, Foltyn W, Kajdaniuk D, Kos-Kudła B, Marek B, et al. The relation of serum adiponectin and leptin levels to metabolic syndrome in women before and after the menopause. Endokrynol Pol 2006;57:15-22.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Henneman P, Janssens AC, Zillikens MC, Frolich M, Frants RR, Oostra BA, et al. Menopause impacts the relation of plasma adiponectin levels with the metabolic syndrome. J Intern Med 2010;267:402-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Ainy E, Mirmiran P, Zahedi Asl S, Azizi F. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome during menopausal transition Tehranian women: Tehran lipid and glucose study (TLGS). Maturitas 2007;58:150-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Ghosh A. Comparison of risk variables associated with the metabolic syndrome in pre- and postmenopausal Bengalee women. Cardiovasc J Afr 2008;19:183-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Carneiro G, Faria AN, Ribeiro Filho FF, Guimarães A, Lerário D, Ferreira SR, et al. Influence of body fat distribution on the prevalence of arterial hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors in obese patients. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2003;49:306-11.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Lovejoy JC, Champagne CM, de Jonge L, Xie H, Smith SR. Increased visceral fat and decreased energy expenditure during the menopausal transition. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32:949-58.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Shidfar F, Alborzi F, Salehi M, Nojomi M. Association of waist circumference, body mass index and conicity index with cardiovascular risk factors in postmenopausal women. Cardiovasc J Afr 2012;23:442-5.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Polotsky HN, Polotsky AJ. Metabolic implications of menopause. Semin Reprod Med 2010;28:426-34.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Lobo RA. Metabolic syndrome after menopause and the role of hormones. Maturitas 2008;60:10-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Lin WY, Yang WS, Lee LT, Chen CY, Liu CS, Lin CC, et al. Insulin resistance, obesity, and metabolic syndrome among non-diabetic pre – And post-menopausal women in North Taiwan. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006;30:912-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed145    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded39    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal