|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 135-138
Granulosa cell tumor of ovary: A clinicopathological study of four cases with brief review of literature
BR Vani, K Geethamala, RL Geetha, Murthy V Srinivasa
Department of Pathology, Employees State Insurance Corporation Medical College and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, Rajajinagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
|Date of Web Publication||19-Sep-2014|
Dr. B R Vani
Department of Pathology, Employees State Insurance Corporation Medical College and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, Rajajinagar, Bangalore - 560 010, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Introduction: Adult granulosa cell tumor (GCT) is a rare ovarian malignancy having good prognosis in comparison with other epithelial tumors. The study aims to collect data of all granulosa cell tumors diagnosed in ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR, Rajajinagar, Bangalore over the last 3 years and to describe the patient profile, ultrasonographic and various histopathological features. Materials and Methods: A total of 4 granulosa cell tumors were diagnosed in ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR, Rajajinagar, Bangalore during the period from June 2010 to June 2013. The patient's age, clinical manifestations, radiological and histopathological findings were evaluated. Results: All 4 patients were diagnosed as adult granulosa cell tumor, three of four cases were in premenopausal age group and one case was in perimenopausal age. The clinical manifestations were menorrhagia and abdominal pain. Ultrasonographically, 2 cases of granulosa cell tumors were both solid and cystic and one case each was either solid or cystic. Histologically, variety of patterns like diffuse, trabecular, cords, spindle and clear cells were noted. Both Call-Exner bodies and nuclear grooves were observed in all cases. All four cases showed simple hyperplasia without atypia endometrial findings. Follow up on all patients revealed no evidence of recurrence. Conclusion: Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary is a rare ovarian entity. The important prognostic factor is staging of the tumor. Staging and histopathology helps in prediction of survival. Also diligent endometrial pathology has to be sorted to rule out endometrial carcinoma.
Keywords: Endometrial pathology, Granulosa cell tumor, histopathological findings, ovary
|How to cite this article:|
Vani B R, Geethamala K, Geetha R L, Srinivasa MV. Granulosa cell tumor of ovary: A clinicopathological study of four cases with brief review of literature. J Mid-life Health 2014;5:135-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Vani B R, Geethamala K, Geetha R L, Srinivasa MV. Granulosa cell tumor of ovary: A clinicopathological study of four cases with brief review of literature. J Mid-life Health [serial online] 2014 [cited 2021 Jun 15];5:135-8. Available from: https://www.jmidlifehealth.org/text.asp?2014/5/3/135/141211
| Introduction|| |
Adult granulosa cell tumor (GCT) is a rare ovarian malignancy accounting for 1-2% of all tumors and 95% of germ cell tumors originating from sex cord-stromal cells. ,, These have good prognosis in comparison with other epithelial tumors. Juvenile GCT, another clinic-histologic subtype of GCT accounts for 5%, occurring at an early age and have increased risk of recurrence. ,, Adult GCT has precise clinical, histological and evolutional profile. They frequently occur in postmenopausal women with peak incidence between 50 to 55 years. , Endometrial reaction to these ovarian tumors is simple hyperplasia while few cases of associated endometrial carcinoma have been reported. , The present study was undertaken to evaluate epidemiological, various pathological characteristics of GCT and to study associated endometrial changes.
| Case Reports|| |
A 37-year female presented to the gynaecology outpatient block with history of menorrhagia. On examination the patient was pale looking and her hemoglobin levels were 8 gm%. Other vitals were stable. Ultrasonogram (USG) revealed left adnexal solid-cystic mass with mild heterogeneity and diagnosis of ovarian tumor was offered. After preoperative investigation the patient was subjected to total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salphingo-opharectomy (TAH with BSO). On receipt of the specimen, uterus, cervix was unremarkable with the left ovarian encapsulated mass measuring 12 × 9 × 7 cm and stretched out tube over it. Cut section of the lesion showed solid grey white to yellow tumor with tiny multiple cysts, few of which were filled with blood. No normal ovarian stroma was made out. Other adnexae were unremarkable. On histopathological examination (HPE), mass revealed tumor cells being arranged in cords, solid sheets, trabecular pattern and at places microfollicular pattern with Call-Exner bodies. Individual tumor cells are round to oval with nuclear grooves and mitotic figures of 2/10 high power field. Final diagnosis of GCT - Stage 1A - (T1a, N0, M0-TNM and Federation International de Gynecologie et d'Obsterique (FIGO)) was given. Endometrium showed simple hyperplasia without atypia. [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]
|Figure 1: H and E photomicrograph shows Granulosa cell tumour ovary-tumour cells sheets. Inset shows Call-Exner bodies and nuclear grooves (×40)|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: H and E photomicrograph of scrape cytology shows vague Call-Exner bodies (×40). Inset shows nuclear grooves (×100)|
Click here to view
A 34-year female homemaker presented to the causality with history of pain in the abdomen. Subsequent laboratory investigations performed were within normal limits. USG scan showed left ovarian cystic mass, possibly ovarian carcinoma. After pre-operative investigations the patient was subjected to TAH with BSO. HPE of ovarian mass revealed GCT with extensive areas of haemorrhage and cystic change- Stage 1A - (T1a, N0, M0) (FIGO). Associated endometrial simple hyperplasia without atypia was seen.
A 40-year-old female presented to the causality with excessive bleeding per vaginum. USG revealed ovarian solid mass and a presumptive diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma was offered. After preoperative investigations the patient underwent TAH with BSO. On table the examination of omental, revealed white firm tiny lesion which was biopsied. On HPE the ovary showed encapsulated lesion composed of cells arranged in trabecular pattern and in sheets were seen. Pleomorphic cells with extensive clear and spindle cell change were observed. A differential of endometriod stromal cell sarcoma ovary and GCT were thought off. Immuno-histochemistry (IHC) for inhibin showed diffuse positivity and further sampling of the lesion showed microfollicle pattern and few oval cells with nuclear folds and grooves, mitotic figures of 4/10hpf which confirmed the diagnosis of GCT - Stage 1A - (T1a, N0, M0). Omental biopsy showed only fibrosis and was free of tumor. Associated simple cystic hyperplasia of endometrium and intramural leiomyoma were noted.
A case of 45 years female presented to gynecology outpatient block with pain in abdomen and distension. USG showed ovarian solid cystic mass and diagnosis of ovarian malignancy with ascites was made. Routine laboratory investigations were within normal limits. After preoperative investigation TAH with BSO and omental biopsy was performed. Grossly right ovarian mass measured 12 × 8 × 5 cm and cut surface was grey-white with numerous cystic spaces filled with blood. Representative areas were taken for histopathology. HPE showed tumor composed of sheets of cells. Also they were seen in cords, clusters, microfollicles, Call-Exner bodies, spindle and clear cells. Cells exhibiting nuclear grooves and mitotic figures 2/10hpf were noted. Tumor was seen extending and invading the capsule. Omental tissue was free of tumor and ascitic fluid showed positivity for malignant cells. Special investigation for blood inhibin levels was found to be raised. Final diagnosis of GCT with ascitic fluid extension was made- Stage 1C-(T1C,N0, M0-TNM and FIGO). Endomyometrium showed simple hyperplasia without atypia and adenomyosis.
| Discussion|| |
Granulosa cell tumor of ovary was described by Rokintansky in 1855. , In our institute over a period of three years, total biopsies were 6969, of which 593 cases were malignant. Of them ovarian malignancies were 10 cases accounting to 1.7%, of which GCTs were 4 cases (0.67%). These are rare malignant tumors with two distinct clinicopathologic subtypes like adult and juvenile. Adult variant is commonest accounting to 95% occurring in peri (40-45 years) and post-menopausal women (>45 years) with peak incidence at 50-55 years. , Juvenile GCTs are rare neoplasm comprising 5% of all GCTs occurring in the prepubertal age group. , In the present study three cases presented were in premenopausal and one case in perimenopausal age group [Table 1]. The clinical manifestations ranges from pain abdomen, abdominal distension, menstrual abnormalities like menorrhagia, intermenstrual, postmenopausal bleeding or amenorrhea. ,, In the present study two of our patients presented with menorrhagia and other two had pain in the abdomen. However, in asymptomatic patients coincidental clinicoradiological examinations plays a role in the diagnosis. Endocrine manifestations are related to estrogen hypersecretion resulting in endometrial hyperplasia, leiomyomas and irregular menstrual abnormalities. ,,, Literature search reveals excessive estrogenic stimulation that leads on to endometrial hyperplasia in 25-50% and subsequent development of endometrial carcinoma in 5-13% of cases. , Hence, this emphasizes the fact of cautious diligent search of endometrial histology. In the present study all the four patient's endometrial histology revealed simple hyperplasia without atypia and one case each with added adenomyosis and intramural leiomyoma. Radiologically both juvenile and adult GCTs present as large mass measuring upto 12cms in diameter and solid component with multicystic appearance. ,,, Similar radiological findings of solid cystic components were seen in two of four cases and one case each with only either solid or cystic component noted in our case series.
The traditional treatment modalities followed are complete surgical excision of tumor with unilateral salphingo-opharectomy in patients desirous of preserving fertility. Total abdominal salphingo-opharectomy with bilateral salphingo-opharectomy in patients with completed family. Occasionally followed up with chemo or radiotherapy. ,, In all our four cases, surgery was the treatment of choice which included TAH with BSO since all had completed their family. Ultimate final diagnosis is by histopathological analysis. The adult form includes five histologic patterns like micro, macrofollicle, insular, trabecular and spindle/sarcomatoid. Among these microfollicular pattern with Call-Exner bodies and coffee bean nuclei are the commonest diagnostic points. ,, In the present study all four cases had microfollicular pattern and added two of the cases also showed spindle/sarcomatoid and clear cell subtype. Silver stain shows reticulin fibres around clusters of cells suggestive of GCT. Focal thecal component was seen along with GCT but, however, documented literature necessitates presence of more than 25% of thecal cells to be present to call it a thecoma, which is a benign entity with very good prognosis.  The immuno-histochemistry (IHC) markers valuable in this entity are vimentin, CD99 and inhibin.  The serum tumor markers raised in GCT are estradiol, inhibin, antimullarian hormone and CA-125. ,, In the present study only one of our case showed raised inhibin levels done postoperatively. Commonly encountered differential diagnosis for GCT includes endometrioid carcinoma, stromal sarcoma, carcinoid tumors, adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma. However histopathology of Call_Exner bodies, nuclear grooves and IHC markers help in ruling out the differentials. ,, In the present study, one of our case had differential of endometriod stromal sarcoma and IHC enabled a prompt diagnosis.
Ascitic fluid cytology positive for malignant cells were found in few cases in some of the studies, however survival rate or prognosis for them could not be established.  In the present series one of our case presented with ascitic fluid positivity for malignant cells. Various prognostic factors in GCT have been reported of which the staging is a traditional paramount variable. Others include intraperitoneal disease, tumor size, patients age, histologic grade of differentiation, mitotic activity and nuclear atypia. ,,, In the present study all four cases presented with early first stage (FIGO-Stage 1). Regular follow-up showed no recurrence or metastasis till date and patients are doing well.
Survival rates after 10 years for stage 1, 2, 3 and 4 are 87.2%, 75%, 20%, 0% respectively. ,, In the present study, one of our case showed capsular rupture with positive cytology-Stage 1C. After extensive search the authors found no relevant data regarding this feature helping in further prognostication.  Only one study by Bjorkholm et al.,  documented 60% 25-year survival rate in patients with capsular rupture.
Studies have shown that tumor size less than 10cms have better prognosis. ,, However, Sehouli et al.,  stated that smaller tumor may be aggressive due to their biological behavior; hence, tumor size is not a valid prognostic factor. Patients less than 40 years of age are supposedly associated with better prognosis, however, various authors differ in their opinion with regards to significance of patients age and survival. ,, Histologic grade and mitotic figures show an inverse relation with survival rate. ,,,, In the present case series, all cases were well-differentiated tumors with Mitotic figures 2-4/10 high power fields. Since our follow-up was not upto this period, we are unable to comment on survival rates but still younger age group, early stage and well differentiated tumors helped us predict better prognosis. Recent studies have documented other prognostic factors like pliody, S-phase fraction and p53. However, its relevance as prognostic factors is yet to be investigated further. ,
| Conclusion|| |
Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary is a rare ovarian entity. Paramount prognostic factor is staging of the tumor. Other prognostic factors are tumor histology, mitotic activity and nuclear grade. Hence staging and histopathology helps in prediction of survival. Also diligent endometrial pathology has to be sorted to rule out endometrial carcinoma which helps in its early detection, better management for patient wellbeing.
| References|| |
|1.||Ukah CO, Ikpeze OC, Eleje GU, Eke AC. Adult granulosa cell tumor associated with endometrial carcinoma: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2011;5:340. |
|2.||Adhikari RC, Jha A, Shayami G. Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: A clinicopathological study of six cases. J Pathol Nepal 2011;1:96-9. |
|3.||Sekkate S, Kairouani M, Serji B, Tazi A, Mrabti H, Boutayeb S, et al. Ovarian granulosa cell tumors: A retrospective study of 27 cases and a review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol 2013;11:142. |
|4.||Young RH, Dickersin GR, Scully RE. Juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the ovary. A clinicopathological analysis of 125 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1984;8:575-96. |
|5.||Pautier P, Lhommé C, Culine S, Duvillard P, Michel G, Bidart JM, et al. Adult granulosa-cell tumor of the ovary: A rétrospective study of 45 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1997;7:58-65. |
|6.||Lee IH, Choi CH, Hong DG, Song JY, Kim YJ, Kim KT, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of granulosa cell tumors of the ovary: A multicenter retrospective study. J Gynecol Oncol 2011;22:188-95. |
|7.||Rokitansky CV. Uberabnormalitiaten des corpus luteum. Allg Wien Med Z 1859;4:253-8. |
|8.||Fujimoto T, Sakuragi N, Okuyama K, Fujino T, Yamashita K, Yamashiro S, et al. Histopathological prognostic factors of adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:1069-74. |
|9.||Stenwig JT, Hazekamp JT, Beecham JB. Granulosa cell tumors of the ovary. A clinicopathological study of 118 cases with long-term follow-up. Gynecol Oncol 1979;7:136-52. |
|10.||Bompas E, Freyer G, Vitrey D, Trillet-Lenoir V. Granulosa cell tumour: Review of the literature. Bull Cancer 2000;87:709-14. |
|11.||Kastratovic T, Arsenijevic S, Vukovic I, Mirkovic N, Acimovic L. Granulosa theca cell tumor: A case report and literature review. Medicus 2008;8:152-5. |
|12.||Outwater EK, Wagner BJ, Mannion C, McLarney JK, Kim B. Sex cord-stromal and steroid cell tumors of the ovary. Radiographics 1998;18:1523-46. |
|13.||Stuart GC, Dawson LM. Update on granulosa cell tumours of the ovary. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15:33-7. |
|14.||Sehouli J, Drescher FS, Mustea A, Elling D, Friedmann W, Kuhn W, et al. Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: 10 years follow-up data of 65 patients. Anticancer Res 2004;24:1223-9. |
|15.||Zhang M, Cheung MK, Shin JY, Kapp DS, Husain A, Teng NN, et al. Prognostic factors responsible for survival in sex cord stromal tumors of the ovary: An analysis of 376 women. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104:396-400. |
|16.||Koukourakis GV, Kouloulias VE, Koukourakis MJ, Zacharias GA, Papadimitriou C, Mystakidou K, et al. Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: Tumor review. Integr Cancer Ther 2008;7:204-15. |
|17.||Ellouze S, Krichen-Makni S, Trabelsi K, Ayadi L, Sellami A, Khabir A, et al. Granulosa-cell tumor of the ovary: Report of 16 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2006;35:767-72. |
|18.||Pectasides D, Papaxoinis G, Fountzilas G, Aravantinos G, Pectasides E, Mouratidou D, et al. Adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary: A clinicopathological study of 34 patients by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG). Anticancer Res 2008;28:1421-7. |
|19.||Bjorkholm E, Silfversward C. Prognostic factors in granulosa-cell tumors. Gynecol Oncol 1981;11:261-74. |
|20.||Haba R, Miki H, Kobayashi S. Combined analysis of flow cytometry and morphometry of ovarian granulosa cell tumor. Cancer 1993;72:3258-62. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]