|
 |
| CASE REPORT |
|
| Year : 2018 | Volume
: 9
| Issue : 1 | Page : 41-43 |
|
|
Xanthogranulomatous Oophoritis Mimicking an Ovarian Neoplasm: A Rare Case Report
Gireesha Rawal, Sufian Zaheer, Indrani Dhawan
Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| Date of Web Publication | 14-Mar-2018 |
Correspondence Address:
Sufian Zaheer
Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_111_17
 Abstract | | |
Xanthogranulomatous inflammation of female genital tract is uncommon and is usually seen in endometrium. Only a few cases involving the ovary have been reported. Its clinical manifestations, imaging modalities, and gross features can mimic ovarian malignancy. Thus, a preoperative diagnosis of this entity is important to avoid radical surgical treatment. We report a case of xanthogranulomatous oophoritis in a 24 years female, which was clinically and radiologically misdiagnosed as ovarian neoplasm. The approach to such a case and the differential diagnosis has also been discussed.
Keywords: Oophoritis, ovarian, xanthogranulomatous
How to cite this article:
Rawal G, Zaheer S, Dhawan I. Xanthogranulomatous Oophoritis Mimicking an Ovarian Neoplasm: A Rare Case Report. J Mid-life Health 2018;9:41-3 |
| Introduction | |  |
Xanthogranulomatous inflammation is an unusual type of chronic inflammation that leads to tissue destruction by inflammatory cells comprised of lipid-containing macrophages, lymphocytes, plasma cells, multinucleated giant cells, and neutrophils. Xanthogranulomatous inflammation of female genital tract is uncommon and is usually seen in endometrium. Only a few cases involving the ovary have been reported.[1] Its presentation as a mass lesion in pelvic cavity and invasion of surrounding tissue can mimic a neoplastic lesion clinically, radiologically, and on gross examination.
We report a case of xanthogranulomatous oophoritis in a 24-year-old female, which was clinically and radiologically misdiagnosed as ovarian neoplasm. Histopathological findings revealed characteristics features of xanthogranulomatous oophoritis.
| Case Report | | |
A 24-year-old P3L3A3 female presented with the chief complaints of pain abdomen on and off, and heavy irregular cycles for 6 months. On per vaginal examination, a firm left adnexal mass could be palpated. Her blood investigations revealed microcytic hypochromic anemia, slight raise in total leukocyte count (12,000/L), raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (45 mm at 1st h), and slightly raised lactate dehydrogenase (490 IU/L). Mantoux test was negative. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography abdomen was performed, which showed a left adnexal mass, measuring 8.5 cm × 6.8 cm × 6.3 cm, causing displacement of surrounding bowel loops and lateral displacement of uterus. The mass was multiloculated, cystic with enhancing irregular walls and multiple septations [Figure 1]. The possibility of a benign neoplasm (cystadenoma) was suggested. | Figure 1: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography abdomen showing a left adnexal mass, which is multiloculated, cystic with enhancing irregular walls and multiple septations
Click here to view |
An exploratory laparotomy followed by left salpingo-oophorectomy with pus drainage followed by right tubal ligation was performed. Grossly, the tubo-ovarian mass had a pearly white capsule. On cut, it was gray-white with multiple solid cystic areas, with cysts varying from 0.2 to 3 cm in diameter. On microscopy, a solid cystic lesion was seen, with normal ovarian tissue at the periphery. There was dense granulation tissue formation with abundant foamy macrophages, surrounded by fibrocollagenous tissue showing infiltration by lymphoplasmacytic cells and macrophages, along with congested blood vessels [Figure 2]. Thus, a final diagnosis of xanthogranulomatous oophoritis was given. | Figure 2: Section from tubo-ovarian mass showing dense granulation tissue formation with abundant foamy macrophages, along with lymphoplasmacytic cells and congested blood vessels (H and E, ×10)
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
The female genital tract is very rarely affected by xanthogranulomatous inflammation, and usually, it is confined to the endometrium. Only a few cases of xanthogranulomatous oophoritis have been reported from India.[1]
The average age of patients with affected ovaries is 31 years,[2],[3] and the youngest case reported was of 2 years old. The clinical presentations include pain in abdomen, fever, abdominal mass, menorrhagia, anemia, and anorexia. Gynecological examination reveals adnexal mass with tenderness. Laboratory tests show elevated ESR and raised white blood cell count. Radiological findings of xanthogranulomatous oophoritis may simulate a malignant ovarian neoplasm, due to the involvement of adjacent organs and pelvic peritoneum resulting in adhesions. Grossly, the involved ovary is enlarged and replaced by a solid, yellow lobulated well-circumscribed mass, sometimes involving adjacent organs, thereby mimicking malignancy.[1] Microscopically, there is infiltration of sheets of foamy cells admixed with mixture of inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils with or without multinucleated giant cells.[4] Foamy histiocytes (xanthoma cells) are histiocytes with abundant lipid-laden cytoplasm having vacuolated appearance, responsible for the yellow color on gross examination. The emergence of foam cells may be attributed to the following factors:
- Inefficient or inappropriate antibiotics applied in the early phase of infection that resulted in ineffective control of bacterial multiplication
- Presence of a lipid metabolic disorder that induces hyperlipidemia and the foam cells are formed when the lipid deposited is phagocytosed by phagocytes
- The application of intrauterine contraceptive devices or drugs.[5]
Differential diagnosis of xanthogranulomatous oophoritis includes tuberculosis and fungal infections which can be ruled out by culture and special stains for the causative organisms. Malakoplakia is one of the differential diagnoses of xanthogranulomatous inflammation, which shows cytoplasmic concentric calcific bodies (Michaelis–Gutmann bodies).
According to Karigoudar et al.[6] and Elahi et al.,[7] frozen section is helpful in the diagnosis of xanthogranulomatous oophoritis and intraoperative management, whereby unnecessary and extensive surgery can be avoided in cases of dilemma. Similarly, Chouairy et al.[8] are of the view that that xanthogranulomatous oophoritis may be preoperatively misdiagnosed as an adnexal neoplasm, thus necessitating frozen section to rule out malignancy, as was done in their case. Intraoperative histopathology of xanthogranulomatous oophoritis reveals chronic inflammatory tissue.
However, Pandey et al.[9] have suggested that xanthogranulomatous inflammation does not always masquerade malignancy, so the role of frozen section may be limited to selected cases only.
The treatment of choice for xanthogranulomatous oophoritis is oophorectomy.
In conclusion, xanthogranulomatous oophoritis is a rare lesion whose clinical manifestations, imaging modalities and gross features can mimic ovarian malignancy. Thus, a preoperative diagnosis of this entity should be considered to avoid radical surgical treatment, especially in young patients.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Shukla S, Pujani M, Singh SK, Pujani M. Xanthogranulomatous oophoritis associated with primary infertility and endometriosis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2010;53:197-8.  [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 2. | Jung SE, Lee JM, Lee KY, Han KT, Hahn ST. Xanthogranulomatous oophoritis: MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:749-51. [ PUBMED] |
| 3. | Kaur S, Bodal VK, Bal MS, Bhagat R, Mohi MK, Kaur J. Oophoritis with xanthogranulomatous change - A case report. Res Rev J Med Health Sci 2013;2:8-9. |
| 4. | Kalloli M, Bafna UD, Mukherjee G, Devi UK, Gurubasavangouda, Rathod PS. A rare xanthogranulomatous oophoritis presenting as ovarian cancer. Online J Health Allied Sci 2012;11:11. |
| 5. | Zhang XS, Dong HY, Zhang LL, Desouki MM, Zhao C. Xanthogranulomatous inflammation of the female genital tract: Report of three cases. J Cancer 2012;3:100-6. |
| 6. | Karigoudar MH, Kushtagi AV, Karigoudar RM, Sirasagi A. Xanthogranulomatous oophoritis-a rare inflammatory lesion. J Krishna Inst of Med Sci Univ 2013;2:111-5. |
| 7. | Elahi AA, Nigam A, Pujani M, Batra S. Xanthogranulomatous oophoritis mimicking malignancy: A diagnostic dilemma. BMJ Case Reports 2015;2015:bcr2015210642. |
| 8. | Chouairy CJ, Hajal EA, Nehme YA. Xanthogranulomatous oophoritis secondary to talcum powder. Case report and review of the literature. J Med Liban 2012;60:169-72. |
| 9. | Pandey D, Saxena A, Rao AC, Valiathan M, Thomas J, Shetty J. Xanthogranulomatous inflammation in female pelvis: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Sri Lanka J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;37:18-20. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
|
